- Wrongful deaths – not every victim of personal injury is lucky enough to survive the experience. The victims who succumb to the injuries suffered in this way are entitled to compensation which can and should be collected on their behalf by their remaining family members. However, it is worth pointing out that wrongful death compensation is only possible if the victim dies before the expiry of the statute of limitations for personal injuries in the state.You can find more information hop over to here The statute of limitations is usually pegged at two years in Tampa and therefore you must make sure that you get to file the compensation claim before this time runs out. Wrongful death compensation can cover all sorts of expenses depending on how good your lawyer is in convincing the courts on their justifications. Expenses such as funeral expenses and the upkeep of close family members, especially spouses and children, are some of the main items that will be included in the wrongful death compensation claim.
- Treatment costs – personal injury victims sometimes incur huge expenses in getting specialized treatments for their injuries especially
- When the injuries are very serious or further medical complications arise from them. In fact, some injuries such as spinal injuries can result in severe medical complications that could require lifetime treatment. The costs of undergoing all treatment, both present and future, for problems arising directly from the injuries need to be factored into the final compensation amount.
In the judicial system judges are the supreme personality. It makes decisions on setting up the jury, prosecutor, brings judgment, determines the sentence defendants. It seems that judges are absolute rulers in court and that they are not controlled. Many will say that it really is so. Lately it has been noticed a lot of complaints against judges and the question of who controls and sanction judges.
However, in the US the judges are part of the Judicial Branch of the Government whose power is offset and equaled by both the Legislative Branch and Executive Branches of government. In some states, judges occupy an elective office, and in those cases it can be said that the electorate (the voters) are also their ‘bosses.”
Appeal judges decide on the appeal virtually no control, except when it comes up for review before the Supreme Court. If you are interested click on this website here There are also the questions of their quality. The last fifteen years the quality has dropped so much that it is difficult to quickly remedy the situation. Once, the judge was not allowed to have more than 25 percent reversal of the judgment.
Different countries deal with the idea of judicial independence through different means of judicial selection, or choosing judges. One way to promote judicial independence is by granting life tenure or long tenure for judges, which ideally frees them to decide cases and make rulings according to the rule of law and judicial discretion, even if those decisions are politically unpopular or opposed by powerful interests. This concept can be traced back to 18th century England.
In liberal democracies, the judicial authority shall have the absolute independence of the other branches of government. In the United States, the judicial power is separated from the other two and is in the form of the Supreme Court.
Some theorists argue that the executive power has an impact on the US Supreme Court as President of the United States personally elect judges. However, the counter-arguments are that the president has the right to choose a judge only when one of them dies and that there is no right to remove judges who work.
We all know that if we break law we will have to withstand the consequences that are written for the deed we have done. But very little amount of people ask what law actually is, or how some laws come to existence, and what is their main goal. This article will shed some light of few of those things.
Law is simply a set of rules, rules that must be followed. The law is enforced through social institutions to maintain peace and order, as well as social behaviour of all citizens.
Laws can be made by different parties. They can either be made by single legislator, or by a collective legislature in which case laws result in statuses. Laws can also be made by executives in which case they come through decrees and regulations. For more information continue reading. Judges can make laws, but exclusively in common law and in the form of binding precedents. Private Individuals are capable of creating laws also, but those laws come in the form of legally binding contracts, arbitration agreement is just one of the examples of that.
Formation of laws is influenced by many things, where constitution is one of the strongest and most common factor. Law is a mediator between various people in all spheres of life including politics, economy, society and so on. .
One general distinction can be made regarding laws. There are civil law jurisdictions and common law systems. In the case of civil law jurisdictions its central body is responsible for creation and consolidations of the laws that bind its parties.
In other case, case of common law systems, judges are responsible for laws as their creators.
Civil law jurisdictions include religious laws ( catholic cannon law, socialist law and most widely known sharia law ). In those cases, especially in the case of sharia law, religion has big influence in the law making, and all laws must follow the religious views of the society. In this day and time there is a big number of smaller religious communities that follow different religious laws. Not all of them are good, brutal punishments for crimes Saudi Arabia has is a good example.
Principles of warfare serve two purposes, to enable swift victory without losses and to place limits on acts of war from all sides. I can’t list all principles, but I will list few of them and explain both sides of the coin of each of them. Laws exist to keep those principles in power over all war participants.
First principle is objective. This principle states that all efforts should be used toward the achievement of the objective.
This means that any allowed mean of war should be used to end the mission that army is working on. With the usage of those resources every objective can be reached in short time, but International humanitarian law must be followed during those missions, meaning that any method that would endanger civilian lives is banned from use. If loss of civilian life can’t be avoided then method that will decrease that loss should be used.
Speed of all maneuvers during the offensive is second principle of war. Striking enemy is successive fashion is used to deny the chance for respite of enemy forces. Speed of the action is also useful because it lowers the number of casualties longer battles bring. Rules of IHL should be followed even if that means slower actions, as long as it doesn’t endanger soldiers.
Third principle of war I want to talk about is Concentration of effects ( this principle was derived from mass principle due to the advancement of technology ).
New technology brings remote guided missiles and other means of war that reduce the risk of life loss of soldiers. But bad side of that is the protection of civilians in the war-zone. Due to that IHL has rules about missile bombardment, where missile strikes should be used only if there is little or no chance of civilian casualties.